Partner Stories

Small Experiments Underway

The nonprofits we work with implement our framework in ways as diverse as the organizations themselves. For some, building supportive environments means addressing unrealistic expectations of productivity or improving feedback methods. For others, it means restructuring meetings so everyone’s voice is heard. Here are some of our partners’ experiments with supportive environments.

Supported Staff

Improving Work-Life Balance

Staff at the Community Resource Center (CRC) was struggling to balance work and personal life. Employees weren’t asking for help because of an unintentional “put your head down and get it done” work environment. Using Supportive Environments for Effectiveness (SEE), CRC was able to understand why this mentality was problematic and develop a solution that supported open communication, broke down barriers between employees, and made room for fun.

Productive Communications

Providing Useful, Relevant Feedback

The Gathering Place (TGP) had a process for collecting and providing annual feedback to their employees. The problem? Feedback took a disproportionately long time to complete, and often wasn’t geared toward improvement. TGP worked with staff to understand what was working with the current system, and what wasn’t. Its new system takes time constraints into consideration, and gives staff a more flexible way of discussing performance with their peers.

Impactful Programs

Making Goals Consistent

Board members at the Colorado Alliance for Environmental Education (CAEE) thought they were aligned on the same organizational goals, but realized their interpretations of these goals varied greatly. It was creating conflict within the organization that impeded its ability to function effectively. To get on the same page, CAEE took a step back, and worked together to redefine its mission, vision, and values.

Productive Communications

Rethinking New Board Member Orientation

Spark the Change Colorado wanted to get its new board members up-to-speed quickly. Its approach had always been to provide new members everything they might ever need to know during a one-hour orientation session. But this had the opposite effect: a meeting meant to be informative and inspire engagement felt more like drinking from a fire hose. Using SEE, Spark articulated its priorities for its new board members and revised its orientation structure to accomplish that.

Supported Staff

Improving Offboarding

Community Shares Colorado (CSC) recognized that their lack of an offboarding procedure consistently led to stressful situations in the last two weeks of a staff member’s employment. Using the SEE framework, CSC developed a new, standardized offboarding procedure that provides more clarity to colleagues about the status of the employee’s projects, and gives the departing employee an opportunity to provide feedback.

Productive Communications

Improving Organization-Wide Communication

The Community Resource Center (CRC) found that their quick growth, irregular working hours, and frequent travel were damaging group communication. More meetings were scheduled to compensate and stay in touch, but these provided too little content to be beneficial. CRC used SEE to develop a unique approach that struck a balance between communicating and working.

Supported Staff

Creating a More Effective & Consistent Onboarding Process

The onboarding process at Community Shares Colorado (CSC) provided new hires with an overwhelming amount of material at the outset, but also excluded key information. As a result, new staff felt it took approximately a year until they could comfortably say they had the skill and competencies required without needing to reference other staff. CSC used SEE to better understand what new hires needed to be effective in their roles, and develop a standard onboarding process that met their needs while not becoming burdensome for managers.